{"id":7435,"date":"2020-08-21T12:25:25","date_gmt":"2020-08-21T15:25:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sefaz.acre.gov.br:80\/2021\/?p=7435"},"modified":"2021-11-17T13:25:33","modified_gmt":"2021-11-17T16:25:33","slug":"resolucao-codip-icms-no-8-de-21-de-agosto-de-2020","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/?p=7435","title":{"rendered":"RESOLU\u00c7\u00c3O CODIP\/ICMS N\u00ba 8, DE 21 DE AGOSTO DE 2020"},"content":{"rendered":"\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\n

O Conselho Deliberativo do \u00cdndice de Participa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Munic\u00edpios no ICMS – CODIP\/ICMS, no exerc\u00edcio das atribui\u00e7\u00f5es previstas no art. 8\u00ba da Lein\u00ba 3.532, de 30 de outubro de 2019; e<\/p>\n\n

Considerando o disposto no art. 11 da Lei 3.532\/2019, que atribui ao CODIP\/ICMS a publica\u00e7\u00e3o anual do \u00cdndice de Participa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Munic\u00edpios;<\/p>\n\n

Resolve:<\/strong><\/p>\n\n

Art. 1\u00ba Publicar, conforme Anexo I a esta Resolu\u00e7\u00e3o, o \u00cdndice de Participa\u00e7\u00e3o do Munic\u00edpios no produto da arrecada\u00e7\u00e3o do Imposto sobre Opera\u00e7\u00f5es relativas \u00e0 Circula\u00e7\u00e3o de Mercadorias e sobre Presta\u00e7\u00f5es de Servi\u00e7os de Transportes Interestadual e Intermunicipal e de Comunica\u00e7\u00e3oprovis\u00f3rio (IPM\/ICMS provis\u00f3rio), aplic\u00e1vel no exerc\u00edcio de 2021.<\/p>\n\n

Par\u00e1grafo \u00fanico. Os \u00edndices que comp\u00f5em o IPM\/ICMSprovis\u00f3rio de 2021 conforme seus respectivos percentuais constam dos AnexosII, III, IV, Ve VI desta Resolu\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n

Art. 2\u00ba Os prefeitos municipais e as Associa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Munic\u00edpios do Acre – AMAC, ou seus representantes, poder\u00e3o impugnar os dados e os \u00edndicesprovis\u00f3rios constantes desta Resolu\u00e7\u00e3o, no prazo de 30 (trinta) dias corridos contados de sua publica\u00e7\u00e3o no Di\u00e1rio Oficial do Estado.<\/p>\n\n

Par\u00e1grafo \u00fanico. Em nenhuma hip\u00f3tese ser\u00e3o aceitas impugna\u00e7\u00f5es fora do prazo estabelecido.<\/p>\n\n

Art. 3\u00ba Esta Resolu\u00e7\u00e3o entra em vigor na data de sua publica\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n

Rio Branco-Acre, 21 de agosto de 2020.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n\n

Breno Geovane Azevedo Caetano<\/strong>
Presidente do CODIP\/ICMS<\/p>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t

\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t

ANEXO I<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
ÍNDICE DE PARTICIPAÇÃO DOS MUNICÍPIOS NO ICMS – IPM\/ICMS PROVISÓRIO <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
ANO DE APURAÇÃO: 2020 –  ANO DE APLICAÇÃO:  2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Município<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice do Valor Adicionado<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice do ICMS Ecológico<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice Inverso do Valor Adicionado per capita<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice da Qualidade da Educação Municipal<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice da Regra de Transição<\/strong><\/td>\nIPM\/ICMS<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acrelândia<\/td>\n1,04%<\/td>\n2,95%<\/td>\n3,70%<\/td>\n4,82%<\/td>\n2,01%<\/td>\n1,34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assis Brasil<\/td>\n0,46%<\/td>\n6,42%<\/td>\n2,92%<\/td>\n4,45%<\/td>\n4,40%<\/td>\n1,44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasiléia<\/td>\n3,77%<\/td>\n4,93%<\/td>\n1,76%<\/td>\n5,17%<\/td>\n6,68%<\/td>\n4,43%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bujari<\/td>\n1,01%<\/td>\n1,60%<\/td>\n2,55%<\/td>\n4,27%<\/td>\n2,35%<\/td>\n1,37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capixaba<\/td>\n0,74%<\/td>\n2,37%<\/td>\n4,61%<\/td>\n3,99%<\/td>\n2,93%<\/td>\n1,32%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cruzeiro do Sul<\/td>\n12,02%<\/td>\n3,75%<\/td>\n1,59%<\/td>\n4,48%<\/td>\n2,78%<\/td>\n9,73%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Epitaciolândia<\/td>\n2,84%<\/td>\n3,56%<\/td>\n1,23%<\/td>\n5,10%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n2,22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feijó<\/td>\n1,14%<\/td>\n3,07%<\/td>\n13,67%<\/td>\n4,86%<\/td>\n8,30%<\/td>\n2,91%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jordão<\/td>\n0,59%<\/td>\n5,41%<\/td>\n3,27%<\/td>\n3,99%<\/td>\n3,72%<\/td>\n1,38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mâncio Lima<\/td>\n0,65%<\/td>\n4,94%<\/td>\n7,46%<\/td>\n4,75%<\/td>\n5,79%<\/td>\n1,93%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manoel Urbano<\/td>\n0,85%<\/td>\n4,39%<\/td>\n2,98%<\/td>\n4,56%<\/td>\n3,19%<\/td>\n1,46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Marechal Thaumaturgo<\/td>\n0,71%<\/td>\n8,13%<\/td>\n7,42%<\/td>\n3,99%<\/td>\n4,14%<\/td>\n1,60%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plácido de Castro<\/td>\n1,77%<\/td>\n2,44%<\/td>\n3,78%<\/td>\n4,46%<\/td>\n8,12%<\/td>\n3,26%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Acre<\/td>\n0,76%<\/td>\n1,35%<\/td>\n7,23%<\/td>\n4,42%<\/td>\n2,95%<\/td>\n1,36%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Walter<\/td>\n0,67%<\/td>\n6,85%<\/td>\n4,71%<\/td>\n3,66%<\/td>\n3,72%<\/td>\n1,45%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio Branco<\/td>\n60,99%<\/td>\n6,14%<\/td>\n1,41%<\/td>\n5,58%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n45,85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rodrigues Alves<\/td>\n0,40%<\/td>\n6,16%<\/td>\n7,44%<\/td>\n5,08%<\/td>\n4,34%<\/td>\n1,43%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santa Rosa do Purus<\/td>\n0,55%<\/td>\n4,66%<\/td>\n2,57%<\/td>\n3,42%<\/td>\n3,96%<\/td>\n1,38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sena Madureira<\/td>\n3,05%<\/td>\n4,62%<\/td>\n4,18%<\/td>\n5,14%<\/td>\n8,11%<\/td>\n4,23%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Senador Guiomard<\/td>\n2,74%<\/td>\n4,68%<\/td>\n2,16%<\/td>\n5,08%<\/td>\n6,00%<\/td>\n3,51%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarauacá<\/td>\n1,69%<\/td>\n6,07%<\/td>\n9,22%<\/td>\n4,38%<\/td>\n8,90%<\/td>\n3,42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xapuri<\/td>\n1,56%<\/td>\n5,50%<\/td>\n4,15%<\/td>\n4,33%<\/td>\n7,60%<\/td>\n2,99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SOMATÓRIO<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

ANEXO II<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Demonstrativo da Apuração do índice do Valor Adicionado Fiscal <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ano de apuração 2020 – Ano de Aplicação 2021 <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Município<\/strong><\/td>\nValor Adicionado de 2019<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice do Valor Adicionado de 2019<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice do Valor Adicionado do Exercício Anterior <\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice do Valor Adicionado Médio<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acrelândia<\/td>\nR$ 45.173.017,34<\/td>\n0,99%<\/td>\n1,09%<\/td>\n1,04%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assis Brasil<\/td>\nR$ 9.236.511,40<\/td>\n0,20%<\/td>\n0,72%<\/td>\n0,46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasiléia<\/td>\nR$ 174.336.824,01<\/td>\n3,83%<\/td>\n3,70%<\/td>\n3,77%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bujari<\/td>\nR$ 40.776.312,95<\/td>\n0,90%<\/td>\n1,12%<\/td>\n1,01%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capixaba<\/td>\nR$ 26.144.769,16<\/td>\n0,57%<\/td>\n0,91%<\/td>\n0,74%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cruzeiro do Sul<\/td>\nR$ 575.239.094,28<\/td>\n12,64%<\/td>\n11,40%<\/td>\n12,02%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Epitaciolândia<\/td>\nR$ 146.623.344,72<\/td>\n3,22%<\/td>\n2,47%<\/td>\n2,84%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feijó<\/td>\nR$ 25.956.939,87<\/td>\n0,57%<\/td>\n1,71%<\/td>\n1,14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jordão<\/td>\nR$ 16.807.461,47<\/td>\n0,37%<\/td>\n0,81%<\/td>\n0,59%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mâncio Lima<\/td>\nR$ 12.235.008,62<\/td>\n0,27%<\/td>\n1,03%<\/td>\n0,65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manoel Urbano<\/td>\nR$ 31.281.437,01<\/td>\n0,69%<\/td>\n1,01%<\/td>\n0,85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Marechal Thaumaturgo<\/td>\nR$ 24.776.545,54<\/td>\n0,54%<\/td>\n0,87%<\/td>\n0,71%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plácido de Castro<\/td>\nR$ 53.941.181,13<\/td>\n1,19%<\/td>\n2,36%<\/td>\n1,77%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Acre<\/td>\nR$ 26.322.230,43<\/td>\n0,58%<\/td>\n0,94%<\/td>\n0,76%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Walter<\/td>\nR$ 21.048.966,43<\/td>\n0,46%<\/td>\n0,88%<\/td>\n0,67%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio Branco<\/td>\nR$ 2.949.117.083,85<\/td>\n64,82%<\/td>\n57,17%<\/td>\n60,99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rodrigues Alves<\/td>\nR$ 5.841.639,49<\/td>\n0,13%<\/td>\n0,68%<\/td>\n0,40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santa Rosa do Purus<\/td>\nR$ 13.932.503,46<\/td>\n0,31%<\/td>\n0,79%<\/td>\n0,55%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sena Madureira<\/td>\nR$ 135.341.733,60<\/td>\n2,97%<\/td>\n3,12%<\/td>\n3,05%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Senador Guiomard<\/td>\nR$ 107.928.299,30<\/td>\n2,37%<\/td>\n3,11%<\/td>\n2,74%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarauacá<\/td>\nR$ 54.391.873,18<\/td>\n1,20%<\/td>\n2,18%<\/td>\n1,69%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xapuri<\/td>\nR$ 53.399.359,72<\/td>\n1,17%<\/td>\n1,95%<\/td>\n1,56%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SOMATÓRIO<\/td>\nR$ 4.549.852.136,95<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

ANEXO III<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Demonstrativo da apuração do Índice do ICMS Ecológico <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Dados Oriundos do Índice de Efetividade da Gestão Municipal – IEGM – Quesito Meio Ambiente<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ano de apuração 2020 – Ano de Aplicação 2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Município<\/strong><\/td>\nAvaliação IEGM <\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice da Gestão do Meio Ambiente<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acrelândia<\/td>\n46<\/td>\n5,90%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assis Brasil<\/td>\n25<\/td>\n3,21%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasiléia<\/td>\n33<\/td>\n4,23%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bujari<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n1,79%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capixaba<\/td>\n34<\/td>\n4,36%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cruzeiro do Sul<\/td>\n34<\/td>\n4,36%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Epitaciolândia<\/td>\n22<\/td>\n2,82%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feijó<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n1,79%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jordão<\/td>\n32<\/td>\n4,10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mâncio Lima<\/td>\n19<\/td>\n2,44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manoel Urbano<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n1,79%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Marechal Thaumaturgo<\/td>\n46<\/td>\n5,90%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plácido de Castro<\/td>\n38<\/td>\n4,87%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Acre<\/td>\n21<\/td>\n2,69%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Walter<\/td>\n60<\/td>\n7,69%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio Branco<\/td>\n61<\/td>\n7,82%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rodrigues Alves<\/td>\n67<\/td>\n8,59%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santa Rosa do Purus<\/td>\n13<\/td>\n1,67%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sena Madureira<\/td>\n24<\/td>\n3,08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Senador Guiomard<\/td>\n73<\/td>\n9,36%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarauacá<\/td>\n54<\/td>\n6,92%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xapuri<\/td>\n36<\/td>\n4,62%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SOMATÓRIO<\/td>\n780<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Demonstrativo da Apuração do Índice do ICMS Ecológico <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Índice de Área de Conservação – Quesito Meio Ambiente<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ano de apuração 2020 – Ano de Aplicação 2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Município <\/strong><\/td>\n Área Oficial do Município<\/strong><\/td>\nTerra<\/strong><\/td>\n Área de Conservação <\/strong><\/td>\n Área de Conservação Total <\/strong><\/td>\nPercentual da Área de Conservação em Relação à Área Total<\/strong><\/td>\n Índice da Área de Conservação <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 (ha) <\/strong><\/td>\nIndígena<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acrelândia<\/td>\n180.795,30<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assis Brasil<\/td>\n497.417,40<\/td>\n234.554,18<\/td>\n185.135,01<\/td>\n419.689,19<\/td>\n84,37%<\/td>\n9,64%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasiléia<\/td>\n391.650,50<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n192.911,84<\/td>\n192.911,84<\/td>\n49,26%<\/td>\n5,63%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bujari<\/td>\n303.486,90<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n37.102,74<\/td>\n37.102,74<\/td>\n12,23%<\/td>\n1,40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capixaba<\/td>\n170.197,30<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n5.730,19<\/td>\n5.730,19<\/td>\n3,37%<\/td>\n0,38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cruzeiro do Sul<\/td>\n877.940,70<\/td>\n59.408,11<\/td>\n181.320,23<\/td>\n240.728,34<\/td>\n27,42%<\/td>\n3,13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Epitaciolândia<\/td>\n165.476,90<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n62.385,23<\/td>\n62.385,23<\/td>\n37,70%<\/td>\n4,31%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feijó<\/td>\n2.797.542,70<\/td>\n870.807,09<\/td>\n192.501,70<\/td>\n1.063.308,79<\/td>\n38,01%<\/td>\n4,34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jordão<\/td>\n535.728,20<\/td>\n221.415,18<\/td>\n93.565,14<\/td>\n314.980,32<\/td>\n58,79%<\/td>\n6,72%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mâncio Lima<\/td>\n545.303,40<\/td>\n57.482,83<\/td>\n297.625,98<\/td>\n355.108,81<\/td>\n65,12%<\/td>\n7,44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manoel Urbano<\/td>\n1.063.313,70<\/td>\n120.288,14<\/td>\n529.917,71<\/td>\n650.205,85<\/td>\n61,15%<\/td>\n6,99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Marechal Thaumaturgo<\/td>\n819.169,10<\/td>\n147.514,33<\/td>\n595.072,86<\/td>\n742.587,19<\/td>\n90,65%<\/td>\n10,36%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plácido de Castro<\/td>\n194.385,00<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Acre<\/td>\n260.489,70<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n12,95<\/td>\n12,95<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Walter<\/td>\n644.382,90<\/td>\n85.355,95<\/td>\n253.298,12<\/td>\n338.654,07<\/td>\n52,55%<\/td>\n6,01%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio Branco<\/td>\n883.494,20<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n345.432,22<\/td>\n345.432,22<\/td>\n39,10%<\/td>\n4,47%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rodrigues Alves<\/td>\n307.695,20<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n100.587,49<\/td>\n100.587,49<\/td>\n32,69%<\/td>\n3,74%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santa Rosa do Purus<\/td>\n614.561,20<\/td>\n210.637,18<\/td>\n200.819,82<\/td>\n411.457,00<\/td>\n66,95%<\/td>\n7,65%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sena Madureira<\/td>\n2.375.306,40<\/td>\n159.695,52<\/td>\n1.119.877,41<\/td>\n1.279.572,93<\/td>\n53,87%<\/td>\n6,16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Senador Guiomard<\/td>\n232.204,10<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarauacá<\/td>\n2.017.108,90<\/td>\n288.755,40<\/td>\n632.855,34<\/td>\n921.610,74<\/td>\n45,69%<\/td>\n5,22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xapuri<\/td>\n534.746,70<\/td>\n –   <\/td>\n299.031,96<\/td>\n299.031,96<\/td>\n55,92%<\/td>\n6,39%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SOMATÓRIO<\/td>\n16.412.396,40<\/td>\n2.455.913,91<\/td>\n5.325.183,94<\/td>\n7.781.097,85<\/td>\n <\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

 <\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Demonstrativo da Apuração do Índice do ICMS Ecológico <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ano de apuração 2020 – Ano de Aplicação 2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Município<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice da Gestão do Meio Ambiente<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice da Área de Conservação  <\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice do ICMS Ecológico <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acrelândia<\/td>\n5,90%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n2,95%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assis Brasil<\/td>\n3,21%<\/td>\n9,64%<\/td>\n6,42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasiléia<\/td>\n4,23%<\/td>\n5,63%<\/td>\n4,93%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bujari<\/td>\n1,79%<\/td>\n1,40%<\/td>\n1,60%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capixaba<\/td>\n4,36%<\/td>\n0,38%<\/td>\n2,37%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cruzeiro do Sul<\/td>\n4,36%<\/td>\n3,13%<\/td>\n3,75%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Epitaciolândia<\/td>\n2,82%<\/td>\n4,31%<\/td>\n3,56%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feijó<\/td>\n1,79%<\/td>\n4,34%<\/td>\n3,07%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jordão<\/td>\n4,10%<\/td>\n6,72%<\/td>\n5,41%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mâncio Lima<\/td>\n2,44%<\/td>\n7,44%<\/td>\n4,94%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manoel Urbano<\/td>\n1,79%<\/td>\n6,99%<\/td>\n4,39%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Marechal Thaumaturgo<\/td>\n5,90%<\/td>\n10,36%<\/td>\n8,13%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plácido de Castro<\/td>\n4,87%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n2,44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Acre<\/td>\n2,69%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n1,35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Walter<\/td>\n7,69%<\/td>\n6,01%<\/td>\n6,85%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio Branco<\/td>\n7,82%<\/td>\n4,47%<\/td>\n6,14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rodrigues Alves<\/td>\n8,59%<\/td>\n3,74%<\/td>\n6,16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santa Rosa do Purus<\/td>\n1,67%<\/td>\n7,65%<\/td>\n4,66%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sena Madureira<\/td>\n3,08%<\/td>\n6,16%<\/td>\n4,62%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Senador Guiomard<\/td>\n9,36%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n4,68%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarauacá<\/td>\n6,92%<\/td>\n5,22%<\/td>\n6,07%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xapuri<\/td>\n4,62%<\/td>\n6,39%<\/td>\n5,50%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SOMATÓRIO<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

ANEXO IV<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Demonstrativo da Apuração do Índice Inverso do Valor Adicionado Per Capita<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ano de apuração 2020 – Ano de Aplicação 2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Município<\/strong><\/td>\nPopulação<\/strong><\/td>\nValor Adicionado 2018<\/strong><\/td>\nValor Adicionado 2019<\/strong><\/td>\nValor Adicionado Médio Limitado<\/strong><\/td>\nValor AdicionadoPer Capita<\/strong><\/td>\nInverso do Valor Adicionado<\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice Inverso do Valor Adicionado<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
(R$)<\/strong><\/td>\n(R$)<\/strong><\/td>\n(R$)<\/strong><\/td>\n(R$)<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acrelândia<\/td>\n15.256<\/td>\n34.437.331,72<\/td>\n45.173.017,34<\/td>\n39.805.174,53<\/td>\nR$ 2.609,15<\/td>\n0,04%<\/td>\n3,70%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assis Brasil<\/td>\n7.417<\/td>\n7.435.919,11<\/td>\n9.236.511,40<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 3.306,73<\/td>\n0,03%<\/td>\n2,92%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasiléia<\/td>\n26.278<\/td>\n113.786.024,70<\/td>\n174.336.824,01<\/td>\n144.061.424,35<\/td>\nR$ 5.482,21<\/td>\n0,02%<\/td>\n1,76%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bujari<\/td>\n10.266<\/td>\n36.993.762,13<\/td>\n40.776.312,95<\/td>\n38.885.037,54<\/td>\nR$ 3.787,75<\/td>\n0,03%<\/td>\n2,55%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capixaba<\/td>\n11.733<\/td>\n20.192.198,19<\/td>\n26.144.769,16<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 2.090,34<\/td>\n0,05%<\/td>\n4,61%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cruzeiro do Sul<\/td>\n88.376<\/td>\n497.370.140,78<\/td>\n575.239.094,28<\/td>\n536.304.617,53<\/td>\nR$ 6.068,44<\/td>\n0,02%<\/td>\n1,59%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Epitaciolândia<\/td>\n18.411<\/td>\n141.300.963,78<\/td>\n146.623.344,72<\/td>\n143.962.154,25<\/td>\nR$ 7.819,36<\/td>\n0,01%<\/td>\n1,23%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feijó<\/td>\n34.780<\/td>\n15.963.939,64<\/td>\n25.956.939,87<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 705,18<\/td>\n0,14%<\/td>\n13,67%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jordão<\/td>\n8.317<\/td>\n13.804.065,08<\/td>\n16.807.461,47<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 2.948,90<\/td>\n0,03%<\/td>\n3,27%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mâncio Lima<\/td>\n18.977<\/td>\n9.582.042,01<\/td>\n12.235.008,62<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 1.292,41<\/td>\n0,08%<\/td>\n7,46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manoel Urbano<\/td>\n9.459<\/td>\n29.929.619,61<\/td>\n31.281.437,01<\/td>\n30.605.528,31<\/td>\nR$ 3.235,60<\/td>\n0,03%<\/td>\n2,98%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Marechal Thaumaturgo<\/td>\n18.867<\/td>\n20.576.254,94<\/td>\n24.776.545,54<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 1.299,94<\/td>\n0,08%<\/td>\n7,42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plácido de Castro<\/td>\n19.761<\/td>\n46.950.140,89<\/td>\n53.941.181,13<\/td>\n50.445.661,01<\/td>\nR$ 2.552,79<\/td>\n0,04%<\/td>\n3,78%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Acre<\/td>\n18.504<\/td>\n23.036.719,62<\/td>\n26.322.230,43<\/td>\n24.679.475,02<\/td>\nR$ 1.333,74<\/td>\n0,07%<\/td>\n7,23%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Walter<\/td>\n11.982<\/td>\n19.034.781,26<\/td>\n21.048.966,43<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 2.046,90<\/td>\n0,05%<\/td>\n4,71%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio Branco<\/td>\n407.319<\/td>\n2.616.999.423,21<\/td>\n2.949.117.083,85<\/td>\n2.783.058.253,53<\/td>\nR$ 6.832,63<\/td>\n0,01%<\/td>\n1,41%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rodrigues Alves<\/td>\n18.930<\/td>\n3.397.062,04<\/td>\n5.841.639,49<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 1.295,61<\/td>\n0,08%<\/td>\n7,44%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santa Rosa do Purus<\/td>\n6.540<\/td>\n12.072.658,15<\/td>\n13.932.503,46<\/td>\n24.525.988,05<\/td>\nR$ 3.750,15<\/td>\n0,03%<\/td>\n2,57%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sena Madureira<\/td>\n45.848<\/td>\n76.036.769,48<\/td>\n135.341.733,60<\/td>\n105.689.251,54<\/td>\nR$ 2.305,21<\/td>\n0,04%<\/td>\n4,18%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Senador Guiomard<\/td>\n23.024<\/td>\n97.527.156,88<\/td>\n107.928.299,30<\/td>\n102.727.728,09<\/td>\nR$ 4.461,77<\/td>\n0,02%<\/td>\n2,16%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarauacá<\/td>\n42.567<\/td>\n34.611.911,67<\/td>\n54.391.873,18<\/td>\n44.501.892,42<\/td>\nR$ 1.045,46<\/td>\n0,10%<\/td>\n9,22%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xapuri<\/td>\n19.323<\/td>\n36.346.236,90<\/td>\n53.399.359,72<\/td>\n44.872.798,31<\/td>\nR$ 2.322,25<\/td>\n0,04%<\/td>\n4,15%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SOMATÓRIO<\/td>\n881.935<\/td>\n3.907.385.121,80<\/td>\n4.549.852.136,95<\/td>\n4.310.332.888,89<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

ANEXO V<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Demonstrativo da Apuração do Índice da Qualidade da Educação Municipal  <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ano de apuração 2020 – Ano de Aplicação 2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Município <\/strong><\/td>\n Nota IDEB <\/strong><\/td>\nTaxa Abandono <\/strong><\/td>\n Inverso da taxa de Abandono <\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice da Qualidade da Educação <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
2017<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acrelândia<\/td>\n5,4<\/td>\n0,60%<\/td>\n99,40%<\/td>\n4,82%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assis Brasil<\/td>\n4,9<\/td>\n3,40%<\/td>\n96,60%<\/td>\n4,45%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasiléia<\/td>\n5,9<\/td>\n0,40%<\/td>\n99,60%<\/td>\n5,17%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bujari<\/td>\n4,6<\/td>\n1,00%<\/td>\n99,00%<\/td>\n4,27%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capixaba<\/td>\n4,2<\/td>\n1,70%<\/td>\n98,30%<\/td>\n3,99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cruzeiro do Sul<\/td>\n4,9<\/td>\n0,60%<\/td>\n99,40%<\/td>\n4,48%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Epitaciolândia<\/td>\n5,8<\/td>\n0,20%<\/td>\n99,80%<\/td>\n5,10%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feijó<\/td>\n5,5<\/td>\n3,10%<\/td>\n96,90%<\/td>\n4,86%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jordão<\/td>\n4,2<\/td>\n1,80%<\/td>\n98,20%<\/td>\n3,99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mâncio Lima<\/td>\n5,3<\/td>\n1,20%<\/td>\n98,80%<\/td>\n4,75%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manoel Urbano<\/td>\n5<\/td>\n0,20%<\/td>\n99,80%<\/td>\n4,56%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Marechal Thaumaturgo<\/td>\n4,2<\/td>\n2,20%<\/td>\n97,80%<\/td>\n3,99%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plácido de Castro<\/td>\n4,9<\/td>\n2,30%<\/td>\n97,70%<\/td>\n4,46%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Acre<\/td>\n4,8<\/td>\n0,10%<\/td>\n99,90%<\/td>\n4,42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Walter<\/td>\n3,7<\/td>\n1,20%<\/td>\n98,80%<\/td>\n3,66%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio Branco<\/td>\n6,5<\/td>\n0,20%<\/td>\n99,80%<\/td>\n5,58%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rodrigues Alves<\/td>\n5,8<\/td>\n1,70%<\/td>\n98,30%<\/td>\n5,08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santa Rosa do Purus<\/td>\n3,4<\/td>\n4,30%<\/td>\n95,70%<\/td>\n3,42%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sena Madureira<\/td>\n5,9<\/td>\n2,70%<\/td>\n97,30%<\/td>\n5,14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Senador Guiomard<\/td>\n5,8<\/td>\n1,80%<\/td>\n98,20%<\/td>\n5,08%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarauacá<\/td>\n4,8<\/td>\n3,80%<\/td>\n96,20%<\/td>\n4,38%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xapuri<\/td>\n4,7<\/td>\n1,90%<\/td>\n98,10%<\/td>\n4,33%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SOMATÓRIO<\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n <\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

ANEXO VI<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Demonstrativo da Apuração do Índice da Regra de Transição  <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Ano de apuração 2020 – Ano de Aplicação 2021<\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 Município <\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice do VAF apurado em 2020<\/strong><\/td>\nIPM\/ICMS<\/strong><\/td>\n Perda Potencial em relação ao IPM de  2020 <\/strong><\/td>\nÍndice da Regra de Transição <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
 em Vigor em 2020 <\/strong><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Acrelândia<\/td>\n1,04%<\/td>\n1,29%<\/td>\n0,51%<\/td>\n2,01%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Assis Brasil<\/td>\n0,46%<\/td>\n1,47%<\/td>\n1,12%<\/td>\n4,40%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Brasiléia<\/td>\n3,77%<\/td>\n4,52%<\/td>\n1,70%<\/td>\n6,68%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Bujari<\/td>\n1,01%<\/td>\n1,35%<\/td>\n0,60%<\/td>\n2,35%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Capixaba<\/td>\n0,74%<\/td>\n1,30%<\/td>\n0,75%<\/td>\n2,93%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Cruzeiro do Sul<\/td>\n12,02%<\/td>\n9,72%<\/td>\n0,71%<\/td>\n2,78%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Epitaciolândia<\/td>\n2,84%<\/td>\n1,85%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Feijó<\/td>\n1,14%<\/td>\n2,97%<\/td>\n2,11%<\/td>\n8,30%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Jordão<\/td>\n0,59%<\/td>\n1,39%<\/td>\n0,95%<\/td>\n3,72%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Mâncio Lima<\/td>\n0,65%<\/td>\n1,96%<\/td>\n1,47%<\/td>\n5,79%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Manoel Urbano<\/td>\n0,85%<\/td>\n1,45%<\/td>\n0,81%<\/td>\n3,19%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Marechal Thaumaturgo<\/td>\n0,71%<\/td>\n1,59%<\/td>\n1,05%<\/td>\n4,14%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Plácido de Castro<\/td>\n1,77%<\/td>\n3,40%<\/td>\n2,07%<\/td>\n8,12%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Acre<\/td>\n0,76%<\/td>\n1,32%<\/td>\n0,75%<\/td>\n2,95%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Porto Walter<\/td>\n0,67%<\/td>\n1,45%<\/td>\n0,95%<\/td>\n3,72%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rio Branco<\/td>\n60,99%<\/td>\n45,58%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n0,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Rodrigues Alves<\/td>\n0,40%<\/td>\n1,41%<\/td>\n1,10%<\/td>\n4,34%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Santa Rosa do Purus<\/td>\n0,55%<\/td>\n1,42%<\/td>\n1,01%<\/td>\n3,96%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Sena Madureira<\/td>\n3,05%<\/td>\n4,35%<\/td>\n2,06%<\/td>\n8,11%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Senador Guiomard<\/td>\n2,74%<\/td>\n3,58%<\/td>\n1,53%<\/td>\n6,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Tarauacá<\/td>\n1,69%<\/td>\n3,53%<\/td>\n2,27%<\/td>\n8,90%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Xapuri<\/td>\n1,56%<\/td>\n3,11%<\/td>\n1,93%<\/td>\n7,60%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SOMATÓRIO<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n25,45%<\/td>\n100,00%<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t<\/section>\n\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Publica o \u00cdndice de Participa\u00e7\u00e3o dos Munic\u00edpios no produto da arrecada\u00e7\u00e3o do ICMS (IPM\/ICMS provis\u00f3rio) aplic\u00e1vel no exerc\u00edcio de 2021.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[53,54],"tags":[55],"class_list":["post-7435","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-conselho-deliberativo-do-indice-de-participacao","category-resolucoes","tag-codip"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7435","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=7435"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7435\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=7435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=7435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sefaz.ac.gov.br\/2021\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=7435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}